Evaluate the Strengths and Weaknesses of Reason as a Way of Knowing Essay Sample free essay sample

Reason is a priori. All worlds are born with it. It is a manner of cognizing as it is used in every country of cognition and in coaction with the other ways of cognizing. Unlike the deduction of the prescribed essay subject. ground is non a typical manner of cognizing. To state that is an simplism of the complexness of cognizing. Knowledge can merely be obtained through the inextricably linked ways of cognizing. Reason comes to us of course. For illustration. we intentionally choose to remember past experiences to use it to new and similar experiences. Most people value ground over the other ways of knowing. For illustration. North Americans have the â€Å"be reasonable† and â€Å"think before you act† parlances. and the Chinese have the â€Å"do non utilize emotions to act† parlance. Whenever I get angry or sad. those around me would remind me of those expressions. As can be inferred from the Chinese stating. We will write a custom essay sample on Evaluate the Strengths and Weaknesses of Reason as a Way of Knowing Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page emotion as a manner of knowing is interpreted. at least by the Chinese. as the most undependable. Globally. emotion is mostly seen as the antonym of ground. The importance of ground alterations per individual. depending on academic background. philosophical traditions. civilization. gender. age and etcetera. However. this probe will try to measure the strengths and failings of ground as a manner of cognizing in art and natural scientific discipline. and compare it with emotion. In art. ground is a definite failing. With art and literature. you use imaginativeness and creativeness. Possibly a spot of ground is used to take which coloring material to utilize. but it does non let us to understand beauty. machination and enigma. which are cardinal to our being. The rich experience of art is lost. Without such things. advancement would likely non happen. and the current human race might still be in pre-stone age times. Art can non be understood with ground. â€Å"Artistic look. when effectual. frequently bypasses the human ground and entreaties straight to emotion. †This is why in classs such as English. when given a piece of poesy and asked to compose about for illustration. how the poet conveys intending through images and sounds. the first measure is to hold on its general tone. Rea son is non used to specify your first feeling. State that this verse form has a feeling of unhappiness. Emotion is the first and instantaneous manner of cognizing that is employed. Even when traveling through the verse form once more. emotion is required to pin-point the specific effects of the literary devices. Reason can non be used to experience ; hence as a manner of cognizing art. it is a failing. Conversely. logical thinking is indispensable to science. Processing information collected from an experiment requires a balanced attack of sing the information from multiple angles. which reflects proper and educated logical thinking. A general statement decision must be supported by current and reputable findings. The scientific method is based on this thought. Otherwise. the decision will non be accepted by the scientific community as scientific. In this instance. ground enhances the quality of scientific work and helps us progress. In this instance. ground serves as a regulative criterion. which acts as the anchor for scientific discipline and of which most within the community agree to. Nevertheless. there is ever a little opportunity that accepted theories are incorrect. Take clime alteration as an illustration. The bulk. for clear grounds. say that it is happening. but there are a few that disagree. To be strictly sensible is to non accept that clime alteration is a fact. even if probe after probe proves it to be. It is true that ground is indispensable and cardinal for human discourse and question. but we have monitor it. or else nil in scientific discipline would progress. This thought of ground being a faltering block to come on can be reinforced. Intuitive attack can speed up advancement. but to turn out or to confute the consequence by ground is a long procedure. Science would neer accept decisions that are emotional. intuitive and non sensible. In add-on. intuitiveness can be a superior manner of cognizing. A common illustration is the physician. A physician fresh out of medical school may analyze a patient several times because one set of symptoms could indicate to several different causes. Conversely. an experient physician may settle on one diagnosing instantly. In an exigency. this experient physician is valued for his â€Å"unreasonableness. † If the lupus erythematosus experienced physician was used. the patient coughing up blood abundantly would likely decease before a diagnosing was reached. Another illustration of ground non being an plus in scientific discipline would be when scientific discipline is turned into a religion. like eugenics. the â€Å"scientific† betterment of the human race. Until the reaching of the Nazis. eugenics was an recognized portion of scientific discipline. This turn on ground must be someway regulated. This turn on ground must be someway regulated. taking into the following comparing between ground and emotion as ways of cognizing. As stated antecedently. most civilizations view ground and emotion as antonyms. The velocity of emotional response is seen as inferior to the slower sound response. An case of this might be make up ones minding whether to walk out of a meeting because your thoughts are put down. or to remain and try to warrant your thought. Of class. the latter would be the better pick. However. in some instances. an emotional response may be the wiser pick. The authoritative yet strong and applicable illustration would be jumping back in the face of a unsafe state of affairs such as a stalker all of a sudden nearing you. However this may besides do us to leap to hasty decisions and onslaught back. when the stalker may merely be an old adult male have oning a big trench coat who has found something on the grass. Against popular belief. in some instances ground and emotio n complement each other ; one can steer the other. In concluding. one obtains informations to form and compare it with past experiences and cognition. In contrast. emotion is a reaction to perceptual experience. No categorizing and processing is needed. Therefore. ground is used to set up forms within human experiences. In this manner. you can cognize and categorise feelings ( i. e. â€Å"this is grief† ) . It besides allows us to cognize what others are experiencing and non to arouse them. assisting in mundane interactions between people. Sometimes. my logical thinking is based on my emotions. For illustration. I may experience truly ill of eating french friess and non go to a friend’s party. Another illustration of when emotion can steer ground is when I was make up ones minding which universities to use to. I will take the University of Hong Kong as an illustration. I chose it because of its location in my place of birth. to which I will ever hold an emotional fond regard of it being my place even though I moved to Canada when I was five. The chance of holding my relations near to me and of life in a fast-paced environment has attracted me. This was decidedly non a sensible pick. as I had no anterior research or cognition of the university or plan. Unfortunately. the Holocaust and the 1000000s killed service as a inexorable reminder of the effect of ground set by emotion. Propaganda deforms ground through emotion. and destroys the ability of people to believe for themselves. Such emotionally-charged logical thinking is terrorizing. as it causes people to make irrational workss. like commit race murder. However. this is non to state that ground nothingness of emotion is the manner to travel. Imagine a universe where useful reason dominated. The aged and the handicapped would go excessively dearly-won to maintain alive. felicity and fulfilment would non count and everyone would go the same. Truthfully. cipher wants to populate in those conditions. as it is imperfection that makes us human. Noted. concluding can steer emotions as good. An case would be when I received the voluntary agenda for December from church. I had made it clear to the coordinator that I would take that month away. in readying for test. However. I was still scheduled to function one Sunday. As a consequence. I was angry with the coordinator. But when I realized that there was merely no other pick. and that I was already scheduled merely one time alternatively of twice. my choler subsided. Reason must have up to its ain restrictions. This raises the inquiry of what is even meant by â€Å"reason† and â€Å"being sensible. † Reason can be thought of as a criterion that differs from individual to individual. To be sensible is to adhere to this criterion to some grade. knowing that it is impossible to ever run into outlooks. This is because one can non hold all the replies. and likewise one can non needfully reply to all his or her actions. With this in head. it is clear that since everyone’s perceptual experience of ground and attachment to their ain criterion differs. everyone’s construct of â€Å"being reasonable† besides differs. The people of Hitler’s Germany. Stalinist Russia and Maoist China. were all being sensible to their ain criterions. Reason should non be applied to understanding art. and when it is assorted with the emotions that shape art. we lose something cardinal to humanity. Reason is decidedly applied to science. but it needs to be suitably regulated so as non to impede the intuitive advancement of society. One method of modulating ground is through emotion. and frailty versa. It is of import to measure the strengths and failings of ground as a manner of cognizing. given the current times. Nuclear bombs have been created. and pollution is on the rise. These have to make with the naif belief that ground is plenty ; when it is non. WORKS CITED: Edwords. Frederick. â€Å"Humanism. Reason and the Arts. † Frederick Edwords.hypertext transfer protocol: //www. heathens. org/library/modern/fred_edwords/humart. hypertext markup language [ 1 ] . Frederick Edwords. â€Å"Humanism. Reason. and the Arts. † Frederick Edwords. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. heathens. org/library/modern/fred_edwords/humart. hypertext markup language ( accessed February 24. 2009 ) .